<Back>

Disc Herniation and Sciatica

This example illustrates how the Spinex International can be used to track changes in a patient's spinal function during conservative care. The Spinex International can provide information to assist in deciding upon diagnoses and treatment plans, or be used as a management tool monitor the progress of therapy.

History

The patient was a 31 year old female with pain in her lower back and sciatica in her left leg. An initial CT scan revealed a disc herniation at L5/S1.

Spinoscopy

The patient's biomechanical performance parameters were compared to the normal values for a 31-year-old female, lifting the same loads.

For each parameter, the distance between the normal and patient values was established. Where the patient value falls outside of the blue "normal" zone, there is an indication of functional abnormality.

Illustrating this, although pelvic motion is relatively high, it falls within in the upper range of normality. Alpha Total for sagittal flexion shows the gross angle of the trunk with respect to the vertical.

Note that the patient showed a problem when bending. Beyond 30 degrees, the lordosis (spinal curvature) was affected. This was confirmed by the lumbar elongation graph, where, at 30 degrees of flexion, the patient data fell outside of the normal zone.

It was possible to estimate which spine level contributed most to the restriction in mobility by analyzing individual lumbar segments, comparing the contribution for each vertebral segment to that of the normal individual. The distance to normality was calculated and expressed in terms of Z-score.

The following six graphs represent the variation in Z-score of the estimated intersegmental mobilities for each vertebral level. The patient begins to show dysfunction at L2/3, with the largest restriction at the L4/5 level.

The patient’s function is acceptable for small amplitudes (less than 20 degrees) of trunk flexion and worsens with greater angles of trunk motion.

Evaluating Patient Progress

The Spinex International Expert System provides information on the normality of biomechanical response, with a list of potential causes explaining the loss of normality. The estimated portion of the range of motion (ROM) affected by the injury is given for each lumbar segment and a global index of performance, known as the index of normality, is assigned. The accompanying reports serve to illustrate the patient’s progress over time.

On the patient’s first visit, for all loads lifted, her performance was less than 50%. The overall normality of her response was 43%. Spine stiffness during flexion extension (FE) was high (49%), and a minor sprain was detected (6%). Function of the middle and lower lumbar spine, from L2/3 to L5/1, was restricted. Abnormality was also seen during lateral bending (LB), suggesting a possible torsional injury at L4/5.

The patient undertook conservative rehabilitation and came back three weeks later. Upon re-evaluation, performance had improved. Dysfunction appeared only at the L4/5 level, and the patient had an index of normality of 82%.

Outcome

After four months, on the patient’s final visit, L4/5 function had improved to within normal values, although a minor torsional problem remained (LB pathology 3%). Her overall index of normality was 97%.

<Back>
 

I Home I    I Contact Us I    I Feedback I    I Search I
 
Send mail to webmaster with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright � 2004 Spinex International, Inc.
Formerly www.spinex.com